Management Business
-
Layoff
During this time, some warmth is always nice.I understand layoff decisions are never easy.Once, I had a GM who decided to let my boss go.Later, he emailed a coworker and I with the following:"As the longest standing members of the department it would be very nice if you arranged a little farewell for X with the team this week. Invite whoever you decide to include and expense it."I don't like to go into detail about work on my blog. Nor do I want to comment on whether the personnel decisions were right or wrong.However, I appreciated the GM's email. He made a business decision. But, another part of him, acted as a good human being.I've always believed that character is higher than intellect.It's important to be kind regardless of what you do.Business is business. But there are also ways to act 'human' while making sound business decisions.They are not always mutually exclusive.- 2:20 am
- Comments Off
-
The Lurking Factor
For a while, I've been thinking about PUYO's Board succession.
My thought process on this topic taught me an interesting lesson: a women's family value does affect her career.When I think about who could take over the Board, the two key things I take into consideration are:- Heart: does he or she have the right values? Would he/she be kind to our members? Would he/she do the right thing?
- Skill: self explanatory.
I surprised even myself with my lurking question:"After she have kids, would she have time for PUYO?" - I would have never guessed I'd think about this.As a woman, I understand the pull kids and family have on a woman.Therefore, as the Chairperson of the Board, I have started to pad myself for women's exit, particularly, when they start popping babies. Now, I do hope they stay. But, I'm really not going to say much if they choose to leave. I will still love them as much. Family is important.I admit, I can't say my mentality is the same towards a guy. I just don't expect their focus to shift as much.I hate referring to women as 'flight risks', because it just sounds bad. But, I don't deny, I do expect family life to have a bigger impact on women than men. I'm not saying my assumption is right. It's just my gut feel.In planning for succession, this translates to iterations of "when she leaves" plans. Positioning multiple people to take over. However, in a work setting, a manager could decide not to give his or her female subordinate the opportunity altogether, especially for a role that requires intense focus over an extended period of time.And guess what? How do I determine whether her priority would shift?I draw on what she reveals about her family values on an everyday basis.So. I've realized, if I don't want to be marked as a 'flight risk' at work, how I talk about family matters, even in a social setting. Sharing my family ideals might plant seeds into people's head. Management might not mean to judge, but, they could.To be given opportunities, I really need to demonstrate that I would be committed to work.Huh.I am not sexist. But I'm surprised that this lurking factor crossed my mind.Let alone senior management's.It's interesting to be on a different side.Where do I stand on this?Let's just put it this way: E3 taught me a lot about what type of mom I'd be. And if you know what I'm like when I'm mentoring E3ers......I shall leave it at that.- 1:39 am
- Comments Off
-
If You Can't Keep Up, You Will Be Forced Out
Recently there's the massive SOPA PIPA uproar on the internet.
Here's the gist, courtesy of BBC
"The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is the bill being considered by the House of Representatives. The Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) is the parallel bill being considered by the Senate. The proposed legislation is designed to tackle online piracy, with particular emphasis on illegal copies of films and other forms of media hosted on foreign servers. The bills propose that anyone found guilty of streaming copyrighted content without permission 10 or more times within six months should face up to five years in jail. The US government and rights holder would have the right to seek court orders against any site accused of enabling or facilitating piracy. This could theoretically involve an entire website being shut down because it contains a link to a suspect site."
SOPA and PIPA are supported by media giants, not surprisingly.
I understand where these companies are coming from. It's frustrating pouring billions of dollars into movie production to see only limited return due to widespread piracy.
This got me thinking.
Internet is a movement. It's here to stay. Information flow will only get faster and easier. This is not going to change.
Putting SOPA and PIPA in place is merely a band-aid solution for these media companies. I don't think piracy will really stop. People will find new ways. Like it or not, these media giants need to accept that piracy is now part of doing business and should find alternate ways of generating revenue. Essentially, these companies need to augment their business models to account for piracy as opposed to 'fighting the internet'.
Afterall, trying to stop piracy by stopping information flow online isn't what I'd call, "progressing the society".
Putting this into retail context. This situation reminded me of the Walmart versus mom-&-pop-shops conumdrum over a decade ago. Walmart's rapid entry into small cities forced mom & pop shops out of business. Afterall, who could compete with Walmart on price? Then, anti-corporation sentiment was widespread. Small town business owners lobbied local governments to impose bans on Walmart's entry into towns.
But seriously, was that really a long term solution? Retailers that survived explored new ways of doing business. They started focusing on things other than price, such as, offering consumers a better shopping experience by upgrading the look and feel of the stores or offering excellent customer service.
Indeed, mom and pops without scale and cashflow couldn't keep up and were phased out. But, that's business isn't it? If you can't keep up, you will be forced out. Hopefully you have enough foresight to enter and exit markets at the right times.
All in all, I believe, in face of threat, you need to change your business model to 'get with the times'. Protesting against the inevitable is simply not a long term fix.
This actually relates to my personal life.
I used to get really angry about copycat Night It Up!s emerging in the market. I was extremely defensive. However, I learned that, my mentality was not right. In face of competition, I should not think about how to 'sabotage' competition. I should think about, how to change Night It Up!'s offerings to make Night It Up! stand out from similar events, particularly in face of competition. Trying to prevent competition from growing is just a sore loser approach.
After I figured that out, my attitude towards competition changed 180 degrees.
In anything I do, I must keep up. I must adapt. I cannot expect the macro environment to accomodate my inabilility to find new ways of doing things.
If I can't keep up, I will be forced out. And I need to accept that.
-
A Boss Who Builds Loyalty...
... is one who takes that extra step, even when it isn't tied to his/her performance review.
Something happened this week that reminded me of this story years ago.
I had my boss' office keys and he had left for the day.
My boss was an early riser. I didn't want him to be locked out.
So I emailed him knowing he checked his email before heading into the office.
"Bossman, I know you start early. No one's gonna be around. Don't want you to be locked out. I hid your keys in my office, under the snowman cookie jar. My lock's broken so you can head right in."
When I checked my email the next day, Bossman responded, "Thanks. Let's fix your door!"
I didn't think much of it. Probably just a busy Director's passing comment.
I went on with my day.
Late morning, the office caretaker knocked on my door, "xxx sent me to fix your door."
It was such a small thing, but, he called the office caretaker on my behalf!
I was pleasantly surprised.
I didn't work for this boss for too long because I moved on to a different role shortly after.
But, he will always be the boss who took that extra step, even when it was not tied to his performance review.
------------
The thing that sets you apart, could surprise you.
Obviously, you don't measure effectiveness of a boss by above.
But, I want to work for a boss like Bossman, instead of one who makes me feel simply like a number. This is the type of behaviour that builds loyalty.
As a boss, beyond building a performer, pay attention to building a following.
Build a performer with your smarts; build a following with your heart.
I've been extremely lucky with bosses. Male & female superiors alike. Hope my luck prevails.
-
Why Winning Matters... The Man Who Fired Steve Jobs
News of the week: Steve Jobs resigns as Apple CEO.
While my Twitter feed is flooded with headlines surrounding "Future of Apple" and different angles of "Tim Cook" & "Steve Jobs", my takeaway of the week is: winning matters
I found this coverage particularly interesting:
John Sculley on Why He Fired Steve Jobs
Today, Sculley credits Jobs for everything Apple has accomplished and still laments the way things turned out. “I haven’t spoken to Steve in 20-odd years,” Sculley tells The Daily Beast. “Even though he still doesn’t speak to me, and I expect he never will, I have tremendous admiration for him."
.......
“Maybe he should have been the CEO,” says Sculley, “and I should have been the president.”
.......
Sculley now says that one of his biggest regrets is that when he found himself pushed out of the CEO job, he didn’t try to recruit Jobs back to Apple. To Sculley, that could have helped Apple avoid years of floundering. “I wish I had gone back and gotten hold of Steve and said, ‘Hey, I want to go home. This is your company still. Let’s figure out a way for you to come back,’ ” Sculley says. “Why I didn’t think of that, I don’t know.”
Source: The Daily Beast
Let's say today, Steve Jobs did not achieve all the great things that he did. By stroke of bad luck, he, taking the same approach, failed. But Steve Jobs, is still the same Steve Jobs - smart, uses the same decision criteria, manages people the same way, just without the glorious wins.
I bet you Sculley wouldn't talk about Steve Jobs the way he does now.
Tangible results, affect how people perceive your battle, your process.
If you want to be heard, like it or not, you better get results eventually.
Because, that's what people see.
I am a huge advocate of work ethics, of progress, of the journey. But, I know, hard work needs to lead to something.
Or you will not earn the right to speak.
Winning, matters.
- 2:52 am
- Comments Off
-
You Will Assume The Worst If You Don't Trust. Solution? Ask!
I had a total of 2.5 hour sleep in 3 blocks of time today so this is going to be a brain-fart. Sorry. I just need to document this. Long post, don't bother if you have no remote interest in organizational behaviour, leadership or management.
When in doubt, ask. When you don't seek clarification, you risk widening the existing rift. This rift is formed often not based on true action or intent, but rather, based on poor interpretation on your part.
You will have allies in the organization. Inevitably, you will have adversaries too. The concept of trust is so simple and so fundamental. Yet many fail to close the communication loop. When in doubt, they assume, they do not seek clarification.
I've been on both ends. People have doubted my intent. I have doubted people's intent.
A little over a year ago, I was forced out of the very organization I helped build. I was lucky because the youth stood by me. They brought me back. This, was a critical juncture. I learned so many important lessons but I can only tackle one today.
This incident burned me. I loved the organization. I did not understand how anyone could accuse me of some of the things they accused me of. I felt betrayed. I cried. In public. If you know me, you would know, this does not happen often. During that phase, I woke up in cold sweat. I was consumed by nightmares. This, was the extent of how deeply the incident affected me. As such, I spent alot of time reflecting on the incident. I wanted to understand what happened. What did I do wrong? It took me 1.5 years to be able to blog about this incident. And even after this long, I'm not comfortable sharing all the details.
I was accused by my adversaries of exercising my influence within the organization to propagate my personal agenda.
I was perplexed and utterly hurt.
For close to a decade, I fought for and defended the organization with all my heart. Regardless of how tired I was, my commitment had never flinged. Nothing took precedence. I may give many priorities equal #1s, but this organization, was always, always, a #1.
I can touch my heart and say, my motive was clean. For me to be accused of such strong allegations, it was a huge blow.
However, I realized I was at fault too.
- Over the years, I have always effectively managed down, this is why the youth stood by me. But I failed to manage up. It never once occurred to me that the very people I started out with, would ever doubt me. Never. I thought our beliefs could never ever diverge. At some point, because of this naive belief, I stopped communicating. I just didn't think it was necessary. I stopped obtaining buy-in.
- I defended my ideas and points of view passionately, and most detrimentally, without tact. I believed that regardless of how rigorous our arguments were, we had the organization's best interest at heart. Thus the heated arguments would be overlooked. I attacked. I did not give the opposite party an out. And I never hesitated to point out how blatantly stupid some of my adversaries' ideas were. I basically failed to manage my adversaries' egos. I won most of the times, which simply exacerbated the situation.
As such, the two parties stopped communicating.
Frankly, until the incident happened, I had always trusted them. Regardless of how heated our arguments were, I had always trusted their intent. But, they had stopped trusting me. Because they had stopped trusting me, they had stopped sharing information with me.
Whenever I did anything, instead of talking to me to find out why my actions were as such, they assumed the worst. They assumed I was trying to gain dominance, that I was in a power war. I truly wasn't. There were rationales to my decisions.
They misinterpreted my actions, while I never knew my actions were misunderstood.
Days went by, a case started to build. A case built because of my poor communication and my poor EQ, a case built because of my adversaries' flawed assumptions.
Bottom line is this: they did not trust me. And they assumed the worst of me. If we had open lines of communication, this would not have happened.
Vice versa.
I have doubted people's intent. My only saving grace was, I learned from my previous mistake. I communicated. I openly expressed my concerns, in an attempted non-finger-pointing way (chipping off people's defensiveness is not my strength. I'm still experimenting). This individual taught me another important lesson. But this topic is for a different day.
Post talk, I gladly realized, my interpretation was wrong wrong wong. It helped me trust again. And with trust, whenever I encounter similar actions on part of the individual, I no longer assumed the worst. I simply don't.
This is one important lesson I take away this year. I have applied it in non-profit, and in work.
- Trust is imperative. Without it, you'd assume the worst.
- When in doubt, ask. Do not assume.
- Exercise tact, regardless of how comfortable you are with the party, ego management is vital.
- Do not assume values and goals will not diverge. They can. Trust needs to be constantly maintained, it's not a one-time deal.
Back to the original incident. How do I feel 1.5 years later? I admit to my faults. None of us here, are bad people. However, I still feel betrayed. And I will never forget.
Finally, thank you. The youth and the dinosaurs. Your support, gave me tremendous strength. I held on to it. Without it, I'd have crashed. Thank you for bringing me back.
-
Pointing Out What's Wrong Is Easy. Fixing It Ain't So Easy.
"Real leaders are not people who can point out what is wrong. Almost anyone can do that. Real leaders are people who can make things better." - Marshall Goldsmith
When I read this, I stopped, and I smiled. I see it first hand at work.
Here's the article. Don't be a complainer.

----------------------------
Havard Business Publishing: The Best Leadership Advice I Ever Got
Marshall Goldsmith
12:17 PM Monday September 29, 2008
This week's question for Ask the Coach:
As a coach, you are asked to give others advice - what is the best coaching advice that you have ever received?
Like many young Ph.D. students, I was deeply impressed with my own intelligence, wisdom and profound insights into the human condition. I consistently amazed myself with my ability to judge others and see what they were doing wrong.
UCLA Professor Fred Case was my advisor and head of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission - where I was doing my dissertation research. At this point in my career, he was clearly the most important person in my professional life. He was also a man that I sincerely respected. He had done an amazing amount to help the city become a better place. He was also doing a lot to help me.
Although he was normally in a very upbeat mood, one day Dr. Case seemed annoyed. He looked at me and growled, "Marshall, what is the problem with you? I am getting feedback from some people at City Hall that you are coming across as negative, angry and judgmental. What's going on?"
"You can't believe how inefficient the city government is!" I ranted. I immediately proceeded to give several examples of how taxpayer's money was not being used in the way that I thought it should be. I was convinced that the city could be a much better place if the leaders just listened to me.
"What a stunning breakthrough!" Dr. Case sarcastically remarked, "You, Marshall Goldsmith, have discovered that our city government is inefficient! I hate to tell you this Marshall, but my barber who is cutting hair down on the corner figured this out several years ago. What else is bothering you?"
Undeterred by this temporary setback, I angrily proceeded to point out several minor examples of behavior that could be classified as favoritism toward rich political benefactors.
Dr. Case was now laughing. "Stunning breakthrough number two!" he chuckled. "Your profound investigative skills have led to the discovery that politicians may give a more attention to their major campaign contributors than to people who support their opponents. I am sorry to report that my barber has also known this for years. I am afraid that we can't give you a Ph.D. for this level of insight."
As he looked at me, his face showed the wisdom that can only come from years of experience. He said, "I know that you think that I may be old and 'behind the times', but I have been working down there at City Hall for years. Did it ever dawn on you that even though I may be slow, perhaps even I have figured some of this stuff out?"
Then he delivered the advice I will never forget. "Marshall," he explained, "you are becoming a 'pain in the butt'. You are not helping the people who are supposed to be your clients. You are not helping me and you are not helping yourself. I am going to give you two options:
"Option A - Continue to be angry, negative and judgmental. If you chose this option, you will be fired, you probably will never graduate and you may have wasted the last four years of your life.
"Option B - Start having some fun. Keep trying to make a constructive difference, but do it in a way that is positive for you and the people around you.
"My advice is this: You are young. Life is short. Start having fun.
"What option are you going to choose, son?"
I finally laughed and replied, "Dr. Case, I think it is time for me to start having some fun!"
He smiled knowingly and said, "You are a wise young man."
Most of my life is spent working with leaders in huge organizations. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that things are not always as efficient as they could be - almost every employee has made this breakthrough discovery. It also doesn't take a genius to learn that occasionally people are more interested in their own advancement than the welfare of the company. Many employees have already figured out this one as well.
Real leaders are not people who can point out what is wrong. Almost anyone can do that. Real leaders are people who can make things better.
Dr. Case taught me a great lesson. His coaching didn't just help me get a Ph.D. and become a better consultant. He helped me have a better life.
Think about your own behavior at work. Are you communicating a sense of joy and enthusiasm to the people around you - or are you spending too much time in the role of angry, judgmental critic?
Do you have any co-workers who are acting like I did? Are you just getting annoyed or are you trying to help them - in same way that Dr. Case helped me? If you haven't been trying to help them, why not give it a try. Perhaps they will write a story about you someday!
-
They Don't Come. You Seek Them Out
Many people go into business to become entrepreneurs.
I have never been one of those for many reasons.
I shall not delve into the details. But I can reassure you, I am not risk averse.
However, I've recently corrected a misconception.
I used to say, "I can never be an entrepreneur because I don't have any business ideas.
I am not an 'ideas' person.
Believe it or not, through my corporate job, I've realized one thing:
Ideas rarely hit you like a lightning bolt. They are often the result of an evolution of "something". An evolution of observed needs, an evolution of shared best practices, an evolution of failed attempts, etc. They are independent events that happen to you. You then proactively string these independent events together.
You do so by reflecting on these independent events. Ultimately, an idea, or an opportunity, is the result of your concerted effort in seeking it out.
The key word here is not 'idea' or 'opportunity'. It is 'committment'. You commit, then you seek. Only then, you would be able to recognize ideas and opportunities.
You may not know what you're looking for. Nonetheless, you should always be looking.
Not saying I want to be an entrepreneur. Just saying, I've realized, me not being an 'ideas' person should not be a hurdle to anything I decide to do.
Courtesy of Andy & Jacq:
- 12:13 am
- Comments Off
-
You Can't Please Everyone
“Governing is about 80 percent solutions, I’ll take 80 percent solutions every time and I’ll come back next year for the other 20 percent. That’s what governing is about.” - Ken Duberstein, Former White House Chief of Staff
It Takes Alot of Courage to be a Prominent Politician
The public is always fast to attack and slow to compliment. The head figure bears the brunt of all criticisms. Some do get credited for their accomplishments, but I find very often only in educational videos or documentaries. In contrast, if a Head of State screws something up, I have no doubt it will hit newspaper headlines the following morning.
No I do not have an opinion on the Obama administration if you think this is what this post is about. Just that within the last 7 days alone I have heard criticisms on Stelmach, McQuinty, Harper, Miller and of course the ever controversial Obama. This is just off the top of my head, I'm sure there have been alot more attacks on various politicians around the world.
I am not yet knowledgeable enough to form strong opinions on the public servants' political platforms. However, I do know one thing, it takes alot of courage to be a politician. At least much more than the general public gives them credit for.
6 Bosses in 3.5 Years
In my short working tenure, I've had 6 bosses in 3.5 years. Either I've moved or they've moved. Having said that, I learned one thing through the boss shuffles: as a Boss, you will not please everyone. Regardless of how good you are, there would always be a small group of people who disagrees with your style or antic. This is especially true as your team grows.
Size matters. Managing a group of 4 is drastically different from managing a group of 40. As you move up in ranks, your influence increases but your control decreases.
I am privy to the vibrant gossip vine at work. I exit with one simple take-away:
- Be open-minded to feedback and criticism, but at the end of the day, you have to believe in yourself. Trust that you have made the right decision. When confronted with adversity, trust that you may not be wrong. Go for the 80% solution. Believe that your 80% solution is the 80% solution, not the 40% solution your adversaries claim it to be. Not asking you to be a hard-ass, stubborn son of a bitch, but, at the end of the day, you got to believe in yourself.
As long as you deliver results, you get to write history.
An art, not a science.
Yes you can spin the above in various angles, you can come up with various corollaries and you can come up with ample counter examples. Above is my opinion based on un-empirical observations.
- 1:11 am
- Comments Off
-
Henry Ford
A short story I read somewhere, paraphrased, since I don't remember it's origin. But this story stayed with me over the years. You can agree, or disagree, but it stayed with me for a reason.
Henry Ford, despite the current plight of the automotive industry, was one of the greatest entreprenuers of his time. Ford, was also someone, with an unimpressive education background.
He was challenged by some, for his mediocre education, and his lackluster understanding of Accounting, Finance, and Law.
He retorted, "Why do I need to know Accounting, Finance and Law when I can make these smart people work for me?"
Some would argue, to have the Accountants, the Bankers and the Lawyers listen to you, you need to acquire an adequate understanding of the technicalities. You cannot be entirely ignorant.
I agree.
So here's my takeaway, you don't need to be an expert, but you absolutely need to understand how to manage the experts, be it through credibility, acumen, or something else.
That is my intepretation.


Recent Comments